Which brings us to what I understand as the point made by @o_guest : K used OS to effectively dox thousands of OKC users. 5/13
-
-
Replying to @JohnSakaluk @o_guest
Little concern for ethical considerations/empathy for those who might be affected (this is twitter documented, not heresay)… 6/13
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk @o_guest
Then K said it was all in the name of OS, after "publishing" in "journal" K "edits".
@EmilyGorcenski among 1st to take K to task. 7/131 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
If we can shun _______ for p-hacking--which conflicts with our scientific values--why not same treatment for K? 8/13
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Do open science practitioners have a duty to condemn a person they have no connection with?
@o_guest appeared to demand that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"no connection with" — have you seen his twitter, it's covered in
#openscience related stuff, images, hashtags, he's using it as a cover.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @simoncolumbus and
He also, if you recall, was originally, protected by OS people the first time round. So I see many connections with the movement, which we
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @simoncolumbus and
would like to avoid. He doesn't get to use OS as a shield and to prop up vile rhetoric.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @simoncolumbus and
Also, to clarify: I can't demand anything from you. I can't make you act or say anything you don't want to. I have no power over you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @simoncolumbus and
I can ask members of the open science community to call out bad actors and the members can ignore me. Regardless, if we don't call out this
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
kind of behaviour it reflects badly on us in multiple ways.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.