I've thought a lot about this thread, and not sure I agree. Saying there's no social identity for open science does not make it so. 1/13https://twitter.com/annemscheel/status/877159427085828097 …
He also, if you recall, was originally, protected by OS people the first time round. So I see many connections with the movement, which we
-
-
would like to avoid. He doesn't get to use OS as a shield and to prop up vile rhetoric.
-
Also, to clarify: I can't demand anything from you. I can't make you act or say anything you don't want to. I have no power over you.
-
I can ask members of the open science community to call out bad actors and the members can ignore me. Regardless, if we don't call out this
-
kind of behaviour it reflects badly on us in multiple ways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.