Which brings us to what I understand as the point made by @o_guest : K used OS to effectively dox thousands of OKC users. 5/13
-
-
So I made the assumption people would click or they knew how bad he was from last time or read me explaining. Threads on twitter are tough.
-
I found it enlightening to how the community behaved both this time and last time K did something under the OS guise and certain reactions
-
towards me personally have also been useful. I can't really manage what people read that much since Twitter thread management is appalling.
-
But I can now expect a huge blowback as well as a swell of support — so our community certainly works in the way I expected it to given what
-
I know from other similar open activist communities.
-
I think some of it is that I had the benefit of reading everything you said, thinking about it and discussing with you, then distilling it
-
Which is somewhat unfair because you prompted the discussion and put in the work to advance it until I and others understood...
-
there's a separate thing where some people are jumping into the tangled thread with side issues, and they start to derail things
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I read part of that link. It still seemed like you wanted condemnation of his bell curve data usage. Twitter is difficult, yes.
-
I have seen condemnation from within the community a lot in that thread. I have shared condemnation and articles against his points.
-
but that doesn't mean I am required to condemn bell curve data usage because I like OA. That's my only point of diff wid u on this.
-
You aren't _required_ to do anything. But I think the gulf of our disagreement is pretty big.
-
Agree.
-
You went from only point of diff to agreeing it's a gulf of diff — wow, I changed your mind on something albeit about a meta issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.