So while we might not expel from OS club, we clearly are capable of punishing folks whose scientific values don't line up with our own. 4/13
-
-
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
Which brings us to what I understand as the point made by
@o_guest : K used OS to effectively dox thousands of OKC users. 5/131 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk @o_guest
Little concern for ethical considerations/empathy for those who might be affected (this is twitter documented, not heresay)… 6/13
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk @o_guest
Then K said it was all in the name of OS, after "publishing" in "journal" K "edits".
@EmilyGorcenski among 1st to take K to task. 7/131 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
If we can shun _______ for p-hacking--which conflicts with our scientific values--why not same treatment for K? 8/13
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Is p-hacking in research *that* much worse than unethically distributing personal info of thousands, many vulnerable. 9/13
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
That's not *my* OS. My OS gives a shit about ethics/wellfare of "participants" (OKC users are *not* K's actual participants). 10/13
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Its your prerogative whether you call others out for misapplications/misrepresentations of your OS values, 11/13
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Good points. Tho the context I was aware of = graph of bell curve data. Quite diff to wat you described. I'd agree wid u on context u giv.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's interesting how others, e.g.,
@blahah404 and here John, have had much more success with conveying my initial message — what is diff?3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Maybe I should get a green beard in my profile picture. 

Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.