Absolutely not. He is using it explicitly as a shield. Check out his work.
-
-
he isn't using open science, but runs two bullshit journals called Open[something] and justifies his work using the open science label
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest and
Sounds like something that should be called out. As I said, it's important to fight the impression that this is what open science is.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
I think this is what Olivia has been saying all along
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest and
Yes probably! :) But I understand why lots of people are defensive about this. Bullshit should be called out by anyone.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sampendu @blahah404 and
The real point for me is this: there should be no "open science". All science should be open, full stop. And racists should be challenged.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404 and
Gladly (if I can!). But perhaps the best way to do this is to say "Look at this BS: This guys claims to be OS but here's what's wrong..."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
that's what we've been doing
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest and
Perhaps. But I certainly don't blame people for getting defensive about the way it was phrased. I can see both sides here.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
As long as you're and we're calling out racists, I'm positive about the future. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
