Well. You can also criticize the analysis. Where is it flawed? Where did it go wrong. If the data is open this should be easier.
-
-
Exactly - the data in this case is deliberately skewed, and the plot by K is an exceptionally racist interpretation of the data.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @botminds and
If all we do is add more data, we're never challenging the problem of people (a) abusing data to promote racism and (b) making OA look bad
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @botminds and
I didn't say "add more data". I said challenge them with open data (ideally the same data they use). That's the whole point of open science.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sampendu @blahah404 and
The data is often unethically sourced.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404 and
Doesn't this invalidate the notion that he is using open science in the first place?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sampendu @blahah404 and
Absolutely not. He is using it explicitly as a shield. Check out his work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
he isn't using open science, but runs two bullshit journals called Open[something] and justifies his work using the open science label
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest and
Sounds like something that should be called out. As I said, it's important to fight the impression that this is what open science is.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @sampendu @blahah404 and
But I also don't think that the onus is only on people using open science to call out people like that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Let's all him out and let's all use open science. But don't allow open science to be tarred by his actions. It's only going to ruin it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.