I think this is really the issue (and that goes way beyond racism, sexism etc). A lot of people are skeptical of open science...
-
-
Doesn't this invalidate the notion that he is using open science in the first place?
-
Absolutely not. He is using it explicitly as a shield. Check out his work.
-
he isn't using open science, but runs two bullshit journals called Open[something] and justifies his work using the open science label
-
Sounds like something that should be called out. As I said, it's important to fight the impression that this is what open science is.
-
I think this is what Olivia has been saying all along
-
Yes probably! :) But I understand why lots of people are defensive about this. Bullshit should be called out by anyone.
-
The real point for me is this: there should be no "open science". All science should be open, full stop. And racists should be challenged.
-
Good, I'm glad you'll help us.

- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Said it here without including others, oopshttps://twitter.com/o_guest/status/877439758481403905 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.