He's using open data. No?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
I don't understand. He is also using Twitter, a computer, the internet, etc. What makes this specifically about open data?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Research_Tim @blahah404
Read up on him: "his own pseudojournals, Open Behavioral Genetics and Open Differential Psychology" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emil_O._W._Kirkegaard …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
He uses the
#openscience label/community/whatever to presumably add to his credibility or somehow impress, can't see why else.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
That's also how statistics, visualizations, and data in general are used.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Research_Tim @blahah404
OK, well if I can't make you see how the association of his vile rhetoric and open science as well as similar cases (much less flagrant) I
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
won't continue. There is meaningful signal that somebody can infer e.g. "I am not welcome" etc because indeed often URMs aren't welcome.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
I agree with condemning vile rhetoric. What I indeed fail to see is a special association with open science. There are many associations?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Research_Tim @blahah404
That's great for you Tim. I don't think this is how URMs think. Personally, I like the M&M analogy to make people understand why one might
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
be avoidant or suspicious of a particular community over another.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The point is that which I covered in another thread already today, which is that URMs might not feel like their skills are valued and that
-
-
they are welcome if we don't decry bad rhetoric.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.