> your responsibility to make your research reproducible!
-
-
(usually!) and etct etc) and relating to the ethics of carrying out experiments. If you violate these rules and norms you run the risk of
-
being fired by your uni/PI which runs the risk of you eventually not being a scientist.
-
I would like such norms, especially relating to behaviour and ethics of data use and reuse to me made explicit (not set in stone!) so we can
-
have meaningful conversations about them and so we can say "X violated this rule" and so we can say "is rule 8243 a good rule or shall we
-
change it" and so on.
-
I think this should clarify my thoughts — pls feel free to ask me more. I've a feeling u misunderstood (prob my fault) — hope this helps.
-
I think a lot of what you have in mind is already spelled out in ethics codes (sth
@eplebel & I pointed out here https://proveyourselfwrong.wordpress.com/2017/04/04/need-for-new-code-of-ethics-compliance-for-professional-researchers-in-era-of-hyper-competitive-high-stake-academic-culture/ …) -
> and we're just not aware of them/ignore them. We may disagree on the specifics of what should and should not be an explicit rule, but >
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
