> best to reach that goal, and I think being nice & making it as easy as possible for ppl will help a lot. A different point is the one >
-
-
Do we say "Oh, X was a white supremacist, you know, therefore X is not a scientist"? NO. We chastise and police their views and behaviours
-
while acknowledging that these people are historically scientists and with the hope that things are better. Because we want inclusivity —
-
otherwise we run the inherent risk of making URMs think science is not a place for their skills.
-
2nd, there is no such as "you have to be a nice person" for many reasons including that "nice" is undefined/subjective. But there are
-
standards of behaviour relating to professionalism (you don't go to work in your bikini or your pyjamas (usually!), you don't insult people
-
(usually!) and etct etc) and relating to the ethics of carrying out experiments. If you violate these rules and norms you run the risk of
-
being fired by your uni/PI which runs the risk of you eventually not being a scientist.
-
I would like such norms, especially relating to behaviour and ethics of data use and reuse to me made explicit (not set in stone!) so we can
-
have meaningful conversations about them and so we can say "X violated this rule" and so we can say "is rule 8243 a good rule or shall we
-
change it" and so on.
-
I think this should clarify my thoughts — pls feel free to ask me more. I've a feeling u misunderstood (prob my fault) — hope this helps.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
