> them feel welcome because a) that's what basic human decency demands and b) I think it's more successful. BUT if you choose to not share >
-
-
community which involve both ethical/behaviour rules as well as methodological principles.
-
No! Again - because being nice is my personal decision! I could be an arsehole about it but that wouldn't let you off the hook in terms of >
-
> your responsibility to make your research reproducible!
-
I think you're confusing quite a few things here. Maybe/probably it's my fault for not explaining it better.

-
1st, being a bad person doesn't have any bearing on how open or closed your research is. Of course you can be the best most open scientist
-
and an utterly terrible person. There are tons of these out there (without the open bit), i.e., many great scientists have been extremely
-
racist and/or sexist — we do not say "this is not a scientist" but we do condemn their bad ideas. Why? Not because we're inherently nice but
-
because many of us know that if we do not condemn these ideas then people URMs and non will think this is the norm within sci culture.
- 18 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.