-
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
Open science is not a group with members and non-members. Improving your research practices is about your research, not about belonging.
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @o_guest
however, there are communities around it, however informal, and they give an impression of a culture to onlookers
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
for those of us who believe open science is important and want to promote it, having that culture be welcoming and *open* is crucial
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
and specifically that means welcoming to people under-represented in science, not welcoming to bigots who want to exclude people
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
I don't accept the person who wrote the quoted tweet at the top as being part of any community I'm in - he's precisely one of those bigots
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @annemscheel
He does pretend to be though, therein lies the challenge.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @annemscheel
He wouldn't be allowed to attend any event that I help organise. And would be expelled from any space online that I help moderate.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @annemscheel
This is why professional bodies exist for example to police who gets v to call themselves eg doctor or psychologist etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Which is technically what you propose by sayi you'd gatekeep and police him out.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I agree obviously. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
s, undermining slightly the point. The reason it needs to be addressed = Kierkegaard claims to be in our movement.