-
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
Open science is not a group with members and non-members. Improving your research practices is about your research, not about belonging.
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @blahah404
That's definitely one way to look at it. I personally don't.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It's just not part of the conception of the
@openscience organization. AFAIK all the data@charlesmurray et al use are publicly available.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JPdeRuiter @annemscheel and
You're claiming that open science isn't a community?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @JPdeRuiter @annemscheel and
Sorry, I'm struggling to parse your prev tweet.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @annemscheel and
I'm not claiming that the open science movement is not a community. But it's a community created with a specific goal/mission.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @JPdeRuiter and
@lisadebruine and others are forming a group to discuss, as far as I understand amongst other things, ethical guidelines for open science.4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Lisa DeBruine 🏳️🌈
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
s, undermining slightly the point. The reason it needs to be addressed = Kierkegaard claims to be in our movement.