oh! Yeah, I condemn it, and I think this is a bullshit thing to even try to quantify. What does this have to do with open data/open science?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But is it unethical to study this topic? /1
-
idk the answer, but seems like the Q is /2
-
separate from the kind of Qs the OA ppl /3
-
are focusing on. 4/4
-
I think there's a difference between a topic being unethical and the rhetoric certain people push for a topic being unethical.
-
For example, you've probably seen this, but I don't propose the whole topic is unethical. Many of the people involved in this take down are
-
Again. I'm sure you know this, but just to be clear to all: It's like saying it's OK to force people to smoke (been done) to see if it
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You mean ethical guidelines for methodology / data accessibility, or for the actual content of publications?
-
The first, not the second, but also how data can be reused ethically. Like an ethics board. For example, you can't use big data for HBD BS.
-
In the same way we have ethical for non open data. Like patient doctor confidentiality, etc.
-
BTW I can't comment on what Lisa and others will talk about. Ask them /her. I can only say what I'm thinking on the issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
let me know if I can help in any way (or just cheerlead). happy to chat about $$/intro to funders if that would be of help.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
s, undermining slightly the point. The reason it needs to be addressed = Kierkegaard claims to be in our movement.