to me your response is success! :)
-
-
I'm guessing part of the point is to draw attention away from the author's identity and focus on the ideas?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
the point is, that the need for a single author voice, an identifiable singular behind the content, & assoc. norms is being challenged
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What research is this based on? Or just your hunch?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CokoFoundation and
Besides you signed it with your email address so what exactly are you challenging? You have a person behind it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CokoFoundation and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Coko
Are you quote tweeting me to break the thread?https://twitter.com/CokoFoundation/status/876853989039628288 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CokoFoundation and
The point is you signed it as your email address is you or a surrogate name for you. This is too tiring though because quote tweeting and
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CokoFoundation and
your attitude so far makes me think you don't actually want to engage.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
not sure I understand the issue - the final page has all the authors and other direct contributors listed by name
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
My main issue is the fact that Coko Foundation isn't actually interested in input and is happy to throw links and quote tweets to make a non
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
existent point and relishes the fact I mentioned how confusing the intro is esp to neuroatypical ppl.
-
-
Heya! I had to join another meeting -
@o_guest I'm with you on your confusion - the use of I when no title page, and the push back!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.