It really really threw me. I have no issues with using "I" at all, I welcome it. But not when the author(s) have no name.
-
-
the intro explains who
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Maybe you're not used to writing for neuroatypical people perhaps? This really throws me and the intro doesn't give your name, only at the
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CokoFoundation and
very end and indirectly since it's not your name it's your email address.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
to me your response is success! :)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm guessing part of the point is to draw attention away from the author's identity and focus on the ideas?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
the point is, that the need for a single author voice, an identifiable singular behind the content, & assoc. norms is being challenged
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What research is this based on? Or just your hunch?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CokoFoundation and
Besides you signed it with your email address so what exactly are you challenging? You have a person behind it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
it seems to have worked tho! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm worried you relish this even more since I mentioned the neuroatypical thing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.