It really really threw me. I have no issues with using "I" at all, I welcome it. But not when the author(s) have no name.
The point is you signed it as your email address is you or a surrogate name for you. This is too tiring though because quote tweeting and
-
-
your attitude so far makes me think you don't actually want to engage.
-
not sure I understand the issue - the final page has all the authors and other direct contributors listed by name
-
My main issue is the fact that Coko Foundation isn't actually interested in input and is happy to throw links and quote tweets to make a non
-
existent point and relishes the fact I mentioned how confusing the intro is esp to neuroatypical ppl.
-
Heya! I had to join another meeting -
@o_guest I'm with you on your confusion - the use of I when no title page, and the push back! -
Seems like listening to the lived experience of people who are not the authors makes a lot of sense.
-
Easy fix: add an author, use we, or explain the construct before the reader jumps in!
-
Using "I" is fine... the REALLY confusing bit is going "I and a mate did this this thing" and then introduces everyone except "I" until the
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.