-
-
Replying to @glitchveil
You might or might not have missed the fact that she's a behavioral geneticist and doesn't really need to be lectured on the role of genes..
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dingding_peng
Then why single out the gender and not the specialization of her detractors? Because that wouldn't get her cookie points.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
In other words, mansplaining is the tippy top of an iceberg of abuse aimed at women & mostly perpetrated by men. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/12/the-dark-side-of-guardian-comments …
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @dingding_peng
Femsplain to me how commenters for a rag are equivalent to geneticists. And how do you know the specialization of the guy in OP.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @glitchveil @dingding_peng
"Femsplain to me" only if you pay.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @dingding_peng
Wouldn't that be problematic? Kudos for not telling me to educate myself though ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @glitchveil @dingding_peng
Would be prob if you didn't pay & I did it free. I'm not pouring taxpayers' money into educating you — so this can only be done privately.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @dingding_peng
But if you're not a geneticist how are you better at explaining it to me than a male is? Is femsplaining inherently superior (and costly)?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The invisible hand of the market points you to the male geneticists online whom you may attempt to employ to explain this to you. Good luck!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
