Sure, if transparent, as you say. I guess the line has to be drawn at the extremes, but dissenting voices can be good for group cohesion.
I'm happy to hear where you think I'm wrong about being more inclusive as I myself feel occasionally excluded.
-
-
I don't think we're disagreeing - just talking around what it all means in terms of what to actually do
-
It feels weird having you two saying you agree with each other while not seemingly agreeing with me, so I think there's clearly something
-
to discuss. I mean, I genuinely would like to know.
-
I think I agree with everything you've said - and did not intend to explicitly agree with Rob (did I?) and not you. Checking myself now.
-
I might have had the wrong impression — I'm glad you both want to discuss.
-
reading back there are a few explicit agreements - generally Rob and I are making similar points - probably because we have similar lenses
-
I respect that ,but I have something to offer too. And hearing double yours might drown out others? I'm sure you agree it's good to
-
allow those with different lens who have (also?) been excluded a lot and are still recovering from gender & ethnic abuse and so many things
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.