-
-
"Dissent" (rhetoric, propaganda) that involves excluding URMs is only good for cohesion if you redefine cohesion to "just us white bros".
-
It can redefine cohesion boundaries. If the way the boundary is going *as a group* is bad, exclude the dissenter (total over-simplification)
-
Yeah, but that not in my experience how this manifests ever.
-
What usually happens, in my exp, is that a bigot is usually not really that much debated against or told to shut up.
-
And even though the group in their minds might think "it's OK" if they were not target, the URMs think "ugh not for me" and speak less.
-
All these thoughts are either explicit or usually implicit, meaning that less speaking up occurs without URMs & others realising exactly why
-
...they just think it's status quo but really the group is whittled down to just the bros talking bro shit. I've seen it more than enough
-
times. Even in classes where the gender is 50/50 the dudes think they are better at coding and the women tend to believe them. Even when I'm
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Sure. 140 char complexity limits notwithstanding ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.