@blahah404 this is one of the many examples @kopshtik was hinting at. Will #OpenData people condemn this? Do we have any ethical values?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
oh! Yeah, I condemn it, and I think this is a bullshit thing to even try to quantify. What does this have to do with open data/open science?
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Charles Murray
BTW yes, it's open-ish https://twitter.com/charlesmurray/status/690528811537059841 … and yes both these two have OA/OD/OS followers.
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
that's like the definition of closed data - 'available upon request' :). I'm won't amplify them, but if I see someone RTing I'll challenge
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest
but, that people can get the data somehow is what allows scientific challenges of stuff like this - the bell curve was debunked at every lvl
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
OK, I guess avail on req is closed, thanks for correcting. It's not lifted from the book tho so it's less labour — that's the point I wanted
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
to highlight. It's easy for these types to run this kind of propaganda/bad science. But yes, also like you say others have put in the huge
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
labour in debunking: https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/6/15/15797120/race-black-white-iq-response-critics …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
What I wanted to stress is that bad science gets around fast, esp if the data set is digitally handed out. While debunking is exhausting.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.