You don't think predatory OA journals should be policed?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
most of the things on Beall's list for example are just regional journals - major journals and publishers much more predatory and harmful
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest
the worst case journals I've seen called predatory in that space are really about giving appearance of credibility in exchange for fee
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest
but I know people who publish in those journals, and they do it because western journals don't even respond to them and they require pubs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @blahah404
That's fine but that's not my experience in my field.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
BTW Oliver might not wanna be so tagged.
Oops.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
untagged. interested to hear your experience - I've never spoken to anyone about it who didn't know what they were doing when they published
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
You think the phd students who publish in frontiers are aware the pr is considered a joke by everybody more senior?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
I don't know, but (in my small sample of papers I've been involved in) I've never experienced good PR and see it as a bureaucratic hurdle
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
OK, I respect that but as a reviewer and receiver of reviews I disagree. If we were in the same field I'd find this constructive... But I'm
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
not convinced we'd even be discussing the same thing...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.