It needs to be policed. Just like predatory OA journals.
You think the phd students who publish in frontiers are aware the pr is considered a joke by everybody more senior?
-
-
Certainly not in my field. Lots of innocent and naive and uninformed students.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't know, but (in my small sample of papers I've been involved in) I've never experienced good PR and see it as a bureaucratic hurdle
-
OK, I respect that but as a reviewer and receiver of reviews I disagree. If we were in the same field I'd find this constructive... But I'm
-
not convinced we'd even be discussing the same thing...
-
Yah quite possibly true. I write constructive reviews but don't try to be a gatekeeper. Everything can get published in the end.
-
Everything can be a preprint.

-
I've seen several things get into N & S by sheer political force. Whatever institution is trusted as gatekeeper, is being played by someone.
-
We agree here. 100%.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Oops.