Something about connecting judgements of scientific papers with connotations from a dating app makes me DEEPLY uncomfortablehttps://twitter.com/dalmeets/status/875478152197402624 …
-
-
Replying to @Julie_B92
Dear everyone tweeting about how great this is, I will @ you. Please do not tweet about how great "Tinder but for science" is. ITS NOT
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92
if they hadn't called it tinder for science it might have had a chance... but it's hard to tell because I won't look at it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404
Like it's not even difficult, call it IMDB of preprints like really
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @blahah404
It's still a terrible idea. You literally can't judge a book by its cover. People will just swipe based on uni rankings etc. No. Just no.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
But the app doesn't show name and affiliation? I just see title and abstract. Not even link.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Interesting. So how do you read the preprint?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I got bored really quickly with a stream of abstracts I know nothing about, so I don't know. Google the title?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Seems like a flaw in the app.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.