This is such a weird thread
-
-
Replying to @neuroecology @shrewshrew and
"don't be precise in peer-reviewed publications"
5 replies 1 retweet 21 likes -
Replying to @bradleyvoytek @neuroecology and
But back to the original issue. I happen to know the math, and the exact processing, did it myself, and still have no idea what it means...
4 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @KordingLab @bradleyvoytek and
Really? "Manifold" is one of the few words I understand in neuroscience, unlike "assembly", "engram", and "oscillation".
2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @tyrell_turing @bradleyvoytek and
But the concept is unbelievable. If our thoughts lie on a low rank (say 1000d) manifold they are too trivial to be worth talking about.
6 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @KordingLab @tyrell_turing and
Trivially activity doesn't live in full space, doesn't exclude state-space being fullD. Interesting version asks if 'true' statespace lowD.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @achristensen56 @KordingLab and
(Shit I responded to the wrong part of this thread and now it doesn't make sense)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @achristensen56 @KordingLab and
Are you saying you went "off manifold?"
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
-


don't send unsolicited pics of your manifold again!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.