Richard, with all due respect, if you can fix the societal issues causing these biases in (Open) science, then please do
-
-
Replying to @Julie_B92 @richarddmorey and
Otherwise don't begrudge us our fight in this small aspect of our lives
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I am not begrudging you any fight. I saw you misrepresent what
@CandiceMorey wrote and responded.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @richarddmorey @Julie_B92 and
Richard D. Morey Retweeted Julie Blommaert 👩🏼🔬
You asked me a followup question, and I tried to explain.https://twitter.com/Julie_B92/status/874234445997453312 …
Richard D. Morey added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @richarddmorey @DaniRabaiotti and
If I misinterpreted what Candice was trying to say, she's free to clear it up herself
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @richarddmorey and
We're all in science. We choose (or don't) to engage with subset "open science". Science is biased. Avoiding OS *because* it is biased >>>
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CandiceMorey @Julie_B92 and
doesn't protect us from experiencing bias. So I don't get why defaulting to the status quo is preferable; it will be just as exhausting.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CandiceMorey @Julie_B92 and
I don't avoid open science or want to default to status quo. All my code is open, all my data is open, I have preprints etc. I just care.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CandiceMorey and
I want my community, if it even accepts me as a member, to be better than old system in multiple ways.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CandiceMorey and
And sadly the status quo for many URMs (& ppl in general) is indeed extremely exhausting. I want to challenge and change that.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
ECRs have a lot to contribute to making science more open and accessible.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.