Well then women and ethnic minorities are far less likely to come on board and open science will suffer and be a poorer system as a result
-
-
I want my community, if it even accepts me as a member, to be better than old system in multiple ways.
-
Absolutely agreed. All I want to add is defaulting to an already biased system on the grounds that OS is so biased won't improve anything.
-
I don't recommend defaulting. Agreed. Improvements are needed on current system in thoughtful and inclusive dialogue.
-
It very tiring that every time I criticise the way we are transitioning to a new more open (hopefully) system I have to explicitly stress my
-
open science credentials. I personally think that shows that open science has work to do with self criticism. We need to be more open about
-
any potential flaws in our ideas so we can easily send transparently deal with them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm in between. On board with open science ideals but concerned about the potential to amplify biases that exist in the current system.
-
I'm into open* because it correlates more with welcoming, kind, ready-to-learn values than does the incentivised, hierarchical status quo.
-
Certainly so in the open source world. Not so in the open science twitter threads I've been in recently.
-
We're important now so old-stream people are interested. Opportunity to share values as well as practice. See this elsewhere in nerdland too
-
Please send all the great people from open source, so really are turbo inclusive, to us. (Open) science needs diversity & feminism so much!
-
*who really are
-
Open source has issues too BTW. But they seem to try and police them a lot. We can all do better.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
