Not saying there is no bias here, rather that I don't see a case for saying it is more or less problematic than others.
-
-
with mainly men demanding from us reasons why URMs/we deserve a place in open science... It's exhausting having to defend our right to a
-
voice within what we think of as our movement too.
-
It's almost like a lot of these people think open science means just putting your data and code online.

-
But open means, or at least could mean, so so so much more. Science is for everybody.
-
I'm so glad so many people agree even in relative silence (via likes and RTs etc) on this issue.
-
Otherwise I think OS might be doomed to be a replication of the current system, which is closed in more ways than just code and data.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
