I just don't think "everything else is biased too" is an acceptable excuse, but I guess not everyone agrees
-
-
Don't we want to hold ourselves, our movement, to a higher standard of all kinds of openness?
-
Sure, but I don't have any more desire to hold *open science* to a high standard than society itself. I care about non-scientists as much.
-
If you don't hold open science to a higher standard of openness you risk losing is.

-
Why would you risk making open science less open to us?
-
What's the point of building a new system just as closed with respect to URMs as the old one?
-
If you renovate a building to have better heating isn't it also a good time to add double glazing?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.