When you questioned Dani as to the source of bias in Open Science. If you know about implicit bias, this should be obvious
-
-
Replying to @Julie_B92 @ppandelis and
With you re: bias in science (hell, in life) needs acknowledged. But I don't see any use in calling out Open Science advocates specifically.
4 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @CandiceMorey @Julie_B92 and
Not saying there is no bias here, rather that I don't see a case for saying it is more or less problematic than others.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CandiceMorey @ppandelis and
I just don't think "everything else is biased too" is an acceptable excuse, but I guess not everyone agrees
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @CandiceMorey and
Who thinks it is an excuse? I haven't seen anyone say that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @richarddmorey @Julie_B92 and
It's definitely been said in threads on twitter the same women (
@Julie_B92 &@DaniRabaiotti) have been on in the past. Depressing and tiring.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
It's definitely *not* what
@CandiceMorey was saying, so I don't get the relevance to for her comment.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @richarddmorey @Julie_B92 and
I respect that, but it been exhausting. The fact that these URM phd students feel this way and infer this are telling.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @richarddmorey and
It's because they have often in the recent past been treated extremely rudely by open science men.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @richarddmorey and
Their heckles are up for a reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Can link to relevant open science vs bropen science threads, if you're curious how they/we got treated last time they/we brought issues up.
-
-
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.