I know about the problems and try to discuss with you possible solutions
-
-
Replying to @ppandelis @DaniRabaiotti and
No, you're denying that the problems exist
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @ppandelis and
How about openly disclosed reviews, but double blind review during the decision making process for acceptance in a journal/conference?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @pietercolpaert @ppandelis and
I think this would be better than All Open All The Time but still doesn't really mitigate a lot of the implicit biases we all hold
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @pietercolpaert and
I think to get the trust of URM, Open Science needs to explicitly make clear the actions in place to mitigate implicit bias as much as poss
4 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @pietercolpaert and
The root solution would be an elevation of our level of consciousness to eliminate the feeling of insecurity
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ppandelis @pietercolpaert and
Dude seriously read a couple papers on implicit bias. There is research on this and you couldn't be more wrong
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @pietercolpaert and
I guess you wouldn't believe me if I told you I have done a lot of research on the issue :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ppandelis @pietercolpaert and
I wouldn't, cause you got the source and the solution for implicit bias wrong
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @ppandelis and
I think that's a bit much - the science on implicit bias isn't exactly at consensus stage, so saying he "got it wrong" a bit simplistic
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Whatever the mechanism (implicit bias or other theory) URMs are URMs for a reason.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.