The key issue with online services like overleaf is that the code, results, and text live in separate places. Not good for reproducibility.
-
-
-
Not entirely true. You can have the overleaf repo synched as a github sub-repo and then synch the two. With e.g,, "article" as the name of
-
the sub-repo aka module.
-
See here for an example where it's on github and overleaf, imagine this is a module within a larger code repo: https://github.com/oliviaguest/what-is-computational-reproducibility …
-
Also I love modules — I use them a lot. Makes it very easy and neat to generalise code to a library, etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I keep all my code on Dropbox, use git to version control, and backup daily to an external. Overleaf's git addition is clutch
-
Why? Because you can sync on both github and overleaf it means I can use any editor while coauthor uses website, for example.
-
I agree Overleaf's git feature is awesome. I used some weird slang here
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

