But how could I be "shamed" if I didn't even know you posted it? Seems very odd to me. Anyway, I'm happy to put it all behind us.
-
-
Replying to @ButlerLabBham @o_guest and
Umm, I was trying to generally state such opinions about preprints are wrong. Not to make you personally feel bad.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OmnesResNetwork @ButlerLabBham and
But what you said was 'hey look at the idiots'. Maybe next time say 'I think this opinion is wrong and here's why' if that's what you mean
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PsychScientists @ButlerLabBham and
sure, ideally tweets could be much longer than 140 characters. I'll try to make my tweets more informative, linking to relevant information
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OmnesResNetwork @ButlerLabBham and
did you notice I fit what you meant into a tweet?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PsychScientists @ButlerLabBham and
your most recent tweet? the "here's why" requires a blog post
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OmnesResNetwork @PsychScientists and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Jordan Anaya
even this tweet is better than "idiot"https://twitter.com/OmnesResNetwork/status/872027569524178944 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @OmnesResNetwork and
and yes you could have said the above tweet I linked to AND THEN linked to a blog post too — or even an image with text. All three!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @OmnesResNetwork and
None of the three require "idiot" or other problematic language.
#ableism1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @PsychScientists and
I agree, I guess I leave actual communication to blog posts and view Twitter as mainly an entertainment/information platform, not discussion
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Consider others do not.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.