This is very true. WRT to peer review, I favour reviewer-blinded to prevent retaliation. If someone uses anon to be a jerk Editor can fix it
-
-
Replying to @JimJohnsonSci @o_guest and
do you think reviewer blinding can work? i identified every reviewer of my last paper by their writing style
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @JimJohnsonSci and
I can occasionally do that too, but that's because they're famous right? The ones we're protective of aren't?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @JimJohnsonSci and
a bit famous yeah, or at least had written papers on the same topic area
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @JimJohnsonSci and
I think it's actually fine. Has anybody got Research on this?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @JimJohnsonSci and
I was planning to do analysis when nature announced double blind experiment last year but life took over - could be done though
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest and
it's probably a lot easier to guess author than reviewer. sometimes the methods give it away.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @elneurozorro @blahah404 and
Yeah and so many other things, who they cite, thank, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @elneurozorro and
But again if bigwig does it matter? I think no.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404 and
no but they could guess your group, and you may still be only a phd student first author
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
True. I'd love to see Research on this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.