But there has to be room for these discussions in the first place
-
-
Replying to @Julie_B92 @elneurozorro and
so, i am involved in building these systems for open publishers and some of this perspective is completely missing from the table
3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @Julie_B92 and
All three, I
@DaniRabaiotti &@Julie_B92, from the start have actually been saying open peer review is board for months...2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404 and
It's a very well known problem that people behave differently with women and other URM names
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @ctitusbrown and
This is very true. WRT to peer review, I favour reviewer-blinded to prevent retaliation. If someone uses anon to be a jerk Editor can fix it
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @JimJohnsonSci @o_guest and
do you think reviewer blinding can work? i identified every reviewer of my last paper by their writing style
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @JimJohnsonSci and
I think this is a common criticism of blinding, but it will be a smaller problem for those newer to the field/those with less power
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @blahah404 and
Ie. you recognise the "big wigs" easier than you would a PhD student. So, it may be real, but I'm not convinced it's harmful
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @blahah404 and
also, if you're really concerned about being recognize you can probably purposely obfuscate yourself
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Certainly can say I've helped people with that. Change their writing style.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @elneurozorro and
For example, change UK English to sound more international etc.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.