Probably grossly oversimplifying would that be because it's more tech & male driven?
-
-
Replying to @jeroenbosman @ctitusbrown and
not that gross - probably a big part of it
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @jeroenbosman and
Also smaller community makes for more manipulation by small loud subgroups.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404 and
Ducking in to say- so you know how there's no bigger open sci advocate than me, right? Well, OS has an issue with invitingness
1 reply 6 retweets 12 likes -
It was a damned hard community to break into. Any step I took to be more open, I felt attacked for not doing enough/doing it right.
2 replies 7 retweets 22 likes -
And costs- I didn't get into it in the article I wrote, but I think the advocacy I do probably affected the 'fit' factor on the job market
2 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
It was just another think marking me as different- and we know URMs pay greater social penalties for not towing the line
2 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
Anyway- I believe in the open sci mission- that's why I'm still here- but we need to really think about how we move forward.
2 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
It's not just about choosing right licences and putting code on github, it's about actually improving accessibility and bringing people in
2 replies 9 retweets 32 likes -
Nothing to add, except to direct interested readers to the longer thread of which this is part.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Many many many sub and side threads.
-
-
Too true.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.