So it's a few people giving OS bad rep among URMs? Let's just ignore them and practice OS where we can.
-
-
Replying to @jeroenbosman @DaniRabaiotti and
Because ignoring people brings about meaningful change
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @jeroenbosman and
I think ignoring is really bad advice. Ignoring problems is how problems grow.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
Also you are asking URMs to ignore microaggressions which is itself a microaggression. Terrible rhetoric.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
Terrible is a strong word. I would just like to focus energy on the positive not on the negative as long as that negative is indeed 1/n
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jeroenbosman @o_guest and
The negative is harming people and harming your movement. If that's not worth your energy, then Open Science is t worth mine
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @jeroenbosman and
Jeroen doesn't speak for Open Science. It's worth my and many other ppl's energy. This community is better with you, if you can stand it :)
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @blahah404 @Julie_B92 and
No one can speak for open science. I certainly cannot. Just trying to discuss change to a system that I think is rotten in many places.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jeroenbosman @blahah404 and
Open science should be open to URMs.
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404 and
And also aware that is easy to say for white/tenured/male people.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I'm glad you're unpacking this. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.