Yes saw that. But was asking specifically for URMs
-
-
Replying to @jeroenbosman @DaniRabaiotti and
I'm not sure what you're asking but maybe you could ask a wider range of URMs
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @DaniRabaiotti and
Wondered whether it's open science or the way people push for it. And will surely ask wider.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jeroenbosman @DaniRabaiotti and
I already answered that, it's neither, it's some of the people pushing for it
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @DaniRabaiotti and
So it's a few people giving OS bad rep among URMs? Let's just ignore them and practice OS where we can.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jeroenbosman @DaniRabaiotti and
Because ignoring people brings about meaningful change
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @jeroenbosman and
I think ignoring is really bad advice. Ignoring problems is how problems grow.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
Also you are asking URMs to ignore microaggressions which is itself a microaggression. Terrible rhetoric.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
-
Replying to @jeroenbosman @o_guest and
I don't think this is about targeted behaviour - my interpretation was that some people are obnoxious and make the culture look toxic
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Exactly. If a bowl of sweets also contains 1% that are lethal poison, you don't eat the sweets. Same with toxic people and cultures!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.