Yes. Sorry but Open Science has a really bad rep, especially among URMs (under represented minorities) (and I quite like open science)
-
-
Terrible is a strong word. I would just like to focus energy on the positive not on the negative as long as that negative is indeed 1/n
-
The negative is harming people and harming your movement. If that's not worth your energy, then Open Science is t worth mine
-
Jeroen doesn't speak for Open Science. It's worth my and many other ppl's energy. This community is better with you, if you can stand it :)
-
No one can speak for open science. I certainly cannot. Just trying to discuss change to a system that I think is rotten in many places.
-
Open science should be open to URMs.
-
Yes, Open Science, or what I would call scholarly commons needs to be fully inclusive in terms of race/income/gender
#peopleandideas -
Then don't ask is to do emotional labour, ignore microaggressions. Stop.
-
We don't have to cope, ignore, be silent.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
3/3 the case here?
-
I don't think this is about targeted behaviour - my interpretation was that some people are obnoxious and make the culture look toxic
-
Exactly. If a bowl of sweets also contains 1% that are lethal poison, you don't eat the sweets. Same with toxic people and cultures!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


