Exactly.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
Do you think it's negative? Do you think the lay audience might see it as a blanket statement?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I do think it's negative, but I also think we as academics can do much more to clarify why basic work is important
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think the fact you can get paid upwards of 1k per day for consulting, in *some* sense means we're pretty valued by the invisible hand.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
But sure. I don't think all scientists are suited to all facets of science, and that's ok. I believe in being inclusive regardless.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes - and that (to me) is a separate and overlapping point: requiring scientists to be able to think/write/market etc etc is unreasonably
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
"market" interesting choice of word there... I personally don't even think twitter is that far reaching. I say that tho and yet a friend of
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
mine in science
@Lyra_Comms met a random lawyer on a train who'd read my blog.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
Regardless, the point I wanted to make has been made. I'm cool with nobody agreeing with it, but I really wanted to express my opinion.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
I think it's a useful feature sci twitter that a lowly pd such as myself can give her 2 pence on a phrase and be at least discussed. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.