Am to I assume that you think it's appropriate because of the title / opening slide? Or do you have any other views on it?
-
-
Do you think it's negative? Do you think the lay audience might see it as a blanket statement?
-
I do think it's negative, but I also think we as academics can do much more to clarify why basic work is important
-
I think the fact you can get paid upwards of 1k per day for consulting, in *some* sense means we're pretty valued by the invisible hand.

-
But sure. I don't think all scientists are suited to all facets of science, and that's ok. I believe in being inclusive regardless.
-
Yes - and that (to me) is a separate and overlapping point: requiring scientists to be able to think/write/market etc etc is unreasonably
-
*unreasonable
-
"market" interesting choice of word there... I personally don't even think twitter is that far reaching. I say that tho and yet a friend of
-
I agree that twitter doesn't reach that far; talk also discussed writing for scicomm, podcasts, and instagram
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

