Logical fallacy...I said Twitter -> not siloed, not no Twitter -> siloed
It can be viewed as an acceptance that academics are in an ivory tower. But you perhaps think we are. So I guess that's our disagreement?
-
-
I don't think all academics are in an ivory tower, but there is a spectrum there--and I suggest some ways/benefits of being less siloed
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Some academics are, some are not
-
Sure. But that's not my point.
-
My point, which I feel I've repeated too much by now is finer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also great to share slides of course. Creates opportunities for discussion, such as this one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am totally fine with being ivory towered but agree that it isn't representative of our work. The reason I'm fine with it >>
-
If everybody worked in Pasteur's quadrant, we probably wouldn't have stumbled upon a lot of great basic scientific discoveries.
-
My point wasn't about topics of research--intended to be domain-agnostic, but about improving ability to communicate what/how we research
-
Just to be clear, my comment was on how people use the word, not about how you've used it. I totally get your message.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

