Am to I assume that you think it's appropriate because of the title / opening slide? Or do you have any other views on it?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @doctorwhy
I used term to mean trad view of academia in unis and publications, and that we should go beyond that and value social media and outreach
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cMadan @doctorwhy
The traditional definition is what I have an issue with.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @doctorwhy
I generally think of the term in-line with the 'modern usage' definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivory_tower …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cMadan @doctorwhy
So "unworldly dreamer"? This is exactly what I take issue with, as I said. Expert bashing based on outdated equivocation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
"intellectual pursuit disconnected from the practical concerns of everyday life". Sounds like good approach for science breakthroughs to me
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'm very concerned with everyday life tho. Phd students are too. As are more senior academics. So many examples of academics being useful.
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Right, but some aren't; Chris was encouraging it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Fair enough. But I disagree with that phrase. It implies a state of the world I don't think is real. It's a dog whistle, altho I realise not
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It really worries me when academics use anti - academic dog whistle phrases.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.