FIrstly, style: it's a mess with all the diff colours (meaningless colour too) and the way the scrolling stops on some images hurts.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti
ah, I actually liked the approach taken on that. In terms of the math and data behind it, I didn't go digging for it; too bad not available
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
would be good if it were available.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ConnectedWaters @DaniRabaiotti
It's really anti-accessibility when you do shit like that with colour and scrolling.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @ConnectedWaters @DaniRabaiotti
You did ask!
I'm anti-#ableism and pro-#openscience.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti
Yep, and thanks for the chat! I was curious. Now I know. Thanks for the input. Would be good to share your feedback to the creators, maybe.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti
If you are into that type of work and do find the pieces you need to rebuild the work, would be cool if u create more accessible version...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
for comparison. That would be neat.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Thanks for the links, yes, I've seen them before as I follow this. It still means the article is lacking in detail/explanation for the algo.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti
no worries, it's not something I follow regularly,but would like to have more time to. I took a class on using census data in GIS moons ago
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.