I think ratio is irrelevant. I'd mostly be evaluating first author stuff in a trainee because writing papers is so important/difficult
-
-
Trouble these days is unless you're v lucky you need the pubs if you're to keep going. Can lead to some unhealthy practices but helps focus?
-
The thing is I wish I was previously in labs that helped me publish. So while I agree, I was never properly guided towards pubs. So perhaps
-
unhealthy practises exist regardless and pressure to publish is not actually properly utilised to help students.
-
Currently, I'm extremely lucky to be in a lab where we all get to publish if we do the work.
-
I have spent years working my butt off for nothing in return. I value pubs. I just don't value them uber alles.
-
That is to say, my position is way more nuanced than "pubs are the most important thing". I'm sure others is too just 140 chars = limiting.
-
Ditto to all of the above! It's the exploring/discovery that kept me going>
-
<but of course one owes it to funders/science(!)/PI/self to publish if poss
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think pubs = MOST important. There's room for some of us in science for sure. Thankfully, while biased & corrupt it still has room.
-
And thankfully it's not a monolith and thankfully it's getting more inclusive by the decade.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Glad to hear it. One reason it's in requirements instead of as a hidden filter later is to save the time of people who feel otherwise.
-
Time-saving is good. Good luck with it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

