When you judge the CV of an early career researcher, is there an ideal range of 1st author vs co-author publications? Which ratios are bad?
-
-
Replying to @Research_Tim
I would be suspicious of almost entirely FA pub list. Noone has that much time as a grad student unless a real prodigy.. or helped alot.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @bradpwyble @Research_Tim
"Helped a lot" is what I call proper supervision. There's little incentive for PIs to gift papers unless the 1st author earned it.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I've seen examples of first author gifting quite a few times. Obviously not going say examples as I'm not interested in shaming anybody.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @LisaDeBruine and
Strange pre-occupation with number of papers. So many uncontrollable factors that lead to few or many publications especially during PhD...
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @GordonFeld @LisaDeBruine and
Oh indeed. I wish people looked past what others have looked past in me. I would not be where I am or have the history I have had without
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @GordonFeld and
some people being able to understand why I have certain missing skills and certain extremely well-calibrated skills.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @GordonFeld and
Obviously, if certain other people were better at their job I would not have had the many health and other problems I have had.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @GordonFeld and
In past I've worked at places which ignored my complains about sexual harassment/assault for example. Thankfully where I am now they do not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
These extraneous factors undermine students and invariable affect their professional performance.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.