I think Lisa's point is that @mdshawkey's position of citing peer-reviewed only but not preprints isn't logical.https://twitter.com/mdshawkey/status/863348386879164416 …
-
-
Replying to @lteytelman @mrgunn and
It is based on the understanding that I am not perfect and neither is peer review, but together we can be pretty good.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @mdshawkey @mrgunn and
Lenny Teytelman Retweeted Brian Nosek
You know, curiously, citing preprints has not destroyed physics over the past 25 years.https://twitter.com/BrianNosek/status/863779971164188672 …
Lenny Teytelman added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lteytelman @mdshawkey and
Do they indeed cite them? Or do they cite the published version?
@BrianNosek was saying in the same thread that they are very fast.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @lteytelman and
Yes. See https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en&vq=phy … on publishing, Econ is particularly slow, I don't know that phys is particularly fast.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Cool! Thanks.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.