I meant all together but yes, can also pick a single one. Number of pubs per year too — so many to choose from.
-
-
I also don't know how to address the knee-jerk criticism that those metrics just measure "scientific talent" so bias is deserved
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LisaDeBruine @mrgunn and
Interesting — I quit my job at v prestigious uni exactly cos I discovered those things do _not_ mean scientific merit but a corrupt system.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @LisaDeBruine and
The amount of bad stuff is too much to tweet. I can assure you it's widespread. You need only look at who's at PNAS, the BW stuff, many egs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @LisaDeBruine and
Saying that these actually capture "good work" is a very troubling assertion that I think we do all make at some point. But it's unfounded.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @o_guest @LisaDeBruine and
Some of the "best" labs p-hack, bully, etc. 
9:51 AM - 14 May 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.