I think Lisa's point is that @mdshawkey's position of citing peer-reviewed only but not preprints isn't logical.https://twitter.com/mdshawkey/status/863348386879164416 …
-
-
Replying to @lteytelman @mrgunn and
Curious that preprint debates occur w/out attending to years of experience in physics (1.2M), econ (804K RePEC) & applied socsci (732K SSRN)
4 replies 19 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @BrianNosek @lteytelman and
Simple Example: 5 arXiv subsections among top 50 pubs in Google Scholar, NBER for econ too: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en …, phys/econ have survived
1 reply 4 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @BrianNosek @lteytelman and
In face, NBER is top in Econ: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en&vq=bus_economics&venue=ZE_eLonyIKMJ.2016 … and arXiv dominates top of Physics: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en&vq=phy … SSRN curiously not indexed
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @BrianNosek @lteytelman and
*fact, was not returning to 4th grade schoolyard taunts. Brings memories of being on receiving end of FACIAL DISGRACIAL!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I noticed but realized what you meant.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.