I think Lisa's point is that @mdshawkey's position of citing peer-reviewed only but not preprints isn't logical.https://twitter.com/mdshawkey/status/863348386879164416 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are papers on that (most but not all are eventually published) but don't have immediate access.
-
Ah, right that explains a lot. In econs (unless I'm mistaken) peer review and the whole pub process takes ages so preprints must super help.
-
So for econs then you (eventually) wouldn't have to cite a preprint anyway as the final pub form would eventually exist right?
-
I wonder if psych ppl are worried that the low quality of some psych preprints would ruin stuff? No idea if this is true, just a guess.
-
I also would love to know what kind of level of publish peer review they have in those fields. Would make me so happy if comments are left!
-
I had such a great experience with my one preprint but I have seen other preprints with few or no comments and that worried me a little.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.